It is the growth engine most brands still treat as an afterthought.
Why rural is winning
For six consecutive quarters, rural FMCG volumes have grown around 8.4%, almost double urban growth at about 4.6%. In most boardrooms, though, nearly 80% of marketing money is still reserved for metros and big cities. This is the biggest mismatch in India’s consumer story today.
Urban markets are clearly slowing down. Penetration is saturating in large cities, consumers are downtrading, and e-commerce is steadily eating into traditional retail margins. The “do more of the same in metros” playbook is giving smaller and inconsistent returns.
What I see as a mentor
Working with startups and MSMEs across India, especially founders from Tier 2, Tier 3 cities and smaller towns, the pattern is consistent. Their fastest growth is coming from districts and rural belts that many large brands still ignore in their annual plans. When we reorient their go-to-market around “Bharat first”, their sales curve changes shape.
Founders who once thought rural was “too hard” are now seeing better unit economics when they build the right distribution and treat rural consumers with respect, not as a discount-hunting segment. In many categories, village customers are adopting branded products and even premium variants faster than expected.
The real size of the prize
Around 850–900 million Indians live in rural areas, more than 2.5 times the population of the US. Rural households already contribute a very significant share of FMCG sales and are driving a growing chunk of premium and “affordable premium” categories. This is not just about volume; it is about aspiration and willingness to pay for the right value.
Rural India also leads the next wave of digital adoption. Over half of India’s 820+ million internet users are now from rural regions, with rural internet usage growing faster than urban. With UPI and Digital India infrastructure, the gap between “online India” and “offline Bharat” is narrowing rapidly.
Who is getting it right
Some large players saw this early and executed patiently. ITC Limited ’s e‑choupal style networks and digital kiosks connected millions of farmers and gave the company deep local insight. Hindustan Unilever’s low-unit-price sachets did not just cut size; they created a new consumption habit that fit rural cash flows and basket size.
Dabur has systematically built a rural-heavy portfolio and now earns a significant share of its revenue from non-urban markets. Challenger brands like Ghadi built their edge by understanding local washing habits, price thresholds, and distribution realities better than bigger multinational competitors.
What winning rural strategy looks like
In every successful rural play, distribution comes before advertising. The basics are still powerful: partner with kirana stores, leverage mobile vans, tap haats and weekly markets, and work with local wholesalers who know every village in a 50 km radius. Fancy brand films cannot fix a broken supply chain.
Product and pricing must align with real life usage. Smaller packs that match weekly income cycles, regional flavours, local language packaging, and value-led messaging outperform generic national campaigns. Rural consumers are value-conscious, not cheap; they reward reliability, trust, and respect more than one-time discounts.
A note to founders and leaders
From a mentor’s lens, ignoring rural today is not just a missed opportunity; it is a strategic blind spot. In the next few years, a majority of FMCG growth and a big part of India’s new internet users will emerge from Bharat, not just from Bengaluru, Mumbai, or Gurgaon. Startups that build their playbooks around rural distribution, local insight, and digital payments will quietly outpace competitors who keep chasing only metro vanity metrics.
So the question is no longer whether you should invest in rural India.
The real question is: how quickly can you rewire your strategy, team, and distribution to serve Bharat with intent?
Follow Paul D & Paul Bros Consulting LLP for more articles.